Wednesday, October 2, 2019

Ecotourism experiences in Sri Lanka: trip report


Ecotourism experiences in Sri Lanka: trip report

Text and Photos by Stam Zogaris and Vassiliki Vlami


Introduction
Natural history activities by tourists include a variety of rather specialized pursuits (e.g. birding, nature photography, botanizing, diving, etc). In developing-stage tropical ecotourist destinations, these activities are often centered on protected areas, particularly the high-profile "parks". Much "nature experience" obviously also takes place outside protected areas but sometimes this is neglected in the promotion literature and in conservatoin management in practice. In this brief report we bring insights from a recent visit to Sri Lanka (late February 2019). We remark on the importance of the authentic "wider landscape" in the ecotourist experience. And also in helping protect it through conservation initiatives, education and effective ecotourism development.

Materials, methods, study areas
Two seasoned ecotourists, myself and my wife, stayed at the following locations: Kandy- (3 nights), Mirissa-Polhena-Matara (8 nights), Deniyaya-Mederipitiya in the Sinharaja rainforest (1 night). The idea being our best-possible immersion into the nature and culture and R&R (=rest and relaxation). Also, we were invited to speak at Ruhuna University, Matara and had meetings with professors from Peredineya University as well. We also maintained and expanded contacts with ecotourism specialists before the trip and upon our arrival back in Greece.

In Sri Lanka we birded each morning from our hotels and guesthouses (early morning walks, c. 2 hrs) and visited and photographed various locations near our residences. We only entered one protected area (Sinharaja Biosphere Reserve) on two days. We snorkeled in shallow reef-flat lagoon conditions on 4 days (Polena coral reef flats- near Matara and Parot Island, Mirissa) and also visited several urban areas.  

Results and discussion

We experianced rich wildlife both outside and within PAs in Sri Lanka. It was easy to observe 100 bird species in 13 days (on two days we had a guide) - our bird data has been uploaded in the ebird database (https://ebird.org/profile/MTAxNzk5Ng/LK). The birding for a northern temperate visitor from Europe or North America is fascinating and the country makes an excellent introduction to the Indo-Malayan Biogeographical Realm. Its not just the birds. In nearly all areas visited the traditional and rural elements and features of the landscape were quite fascinating.  These included frequent and satisfying encounters with rural people, village life, and wildlife, even a few mammals (particularly primates), a rich flora, and varied landscapes, including fascinating and regionally unique cultural landscapes (e.g. the "tanks"- old artificial reservoirs often rich in birds etc.). The sea was also very interesting: Typical coral reef fishes abounded in the dead-coral shallows and reef flats-and we developed a list of photographed fish species. Several other interesting animal groups were prevelent (rain forest herps, butterflies and other spectacular arthropods, stream fishes, etc)- all observed and  easily photographed under excellent conditions. 

Positive aspects of ecotourism development in Sri Lanka

The following important points should be mentioned as positive steps that have been made in developing ecourism in Sri Lanka. Even without mentioning the parks and other PAs, Sri Lanka is strides ahead of many other tropical ecotourism destinations.

-Field guide books covering birds, butterflies, dragonflies, reptiles and mammals are readily available and most are up-to-date and well geared for amateur naturalists. The work of several local and visiting naturalists, including industrious and generous people such as Gehan de Silva Wijeyeratne has been critical in promoting Sri Lanka as a globally-important biodiversity destination.

- A booming guiding industry has developed in recent years, including specialist guides (particularly for birding) and local guides in and around the protected areas. The guides we met were well trained. Some proprietors of hotels and guesthouses have also become informed and may help tourists to explore nature.

-Botanical gardens, especially the fantastic Peradeniya Botanical Garden (Kandy) host spectacular exhibits and some interpretation opportunities of native and non-native plants. This is a legacy of British colonialism and a strong academic interest in nature, horticulture has evolved since the country's independence. 

- Local people's attitude towards wildlife is very positive. Birds are not hunted in Sri Lanka, due to Buddhist inspired law and they are often fearless of people.  People do not fear various reptiles like most snakes and monitors (although they do fear crocs - even Salt Water Crocodiles still survive in Sri Lanka...)

There is no doubt Sri Lanka occupies a special place as an ecotourism show-case area in the Tropics. After the end of the nearly 30 years civil war (2009) the country has developed wildlife and nature tourism remarkably fast.  Smart business choices and marketing have helped, however there has been some serious criticism of the sustainability of ecotourism in Sri Lanka (see paper by Newsome 2013). 

Recommendations

Of course, as one would expect there are serious biodiversity problems in Sri Lanka. Vistors and locals can see this widely. Localized rapid change in landscape patterns especially at and near the coast are easily apparent. This includes: poorly planned tourism development, new high-rise tourist resort buildings being planned and advertised on the coastal roads (near Galle, for example). Industrial monoculture farming (cash-crop palm oil) and natural habitat destruction in woodlands and wetlands were also apparent in some areas. Landscapes change and degrade as tourism and globalized trade spread. Also aesthetic aspects that degrade authenticity were widely apparent, especially in and near urban areas (e.g. a remarkable number of large signs (billboards) is prevalent along the coast and generally degrades landscape authenticity).

 We feel obliged to provide our raw ideas as recommendations here:

-Effort must be made to protect the wider landscape instead of only the official protected areas of Sri Lanka. A large amount of time by any tourist is spent outside protected areas, and if "time-in-nature" is to be maximized by a visitor, most time will be outside of protected areas (i.e. often near hotels or guesthouses and near built-up areas). Many lovely places that are semi-natural are threatened and degraded near urban areas and along the coast. Landscape scale conservation must be identified as an important unmet need, to be strategically promoted and enforced.

- There are many sites of special interest for nature (and for tourists) outside protected areas that require some kind of designation and official protection. These "sites of special natural history interest" are very poorly charted or promoted and most are difficult for naturalists and independent tourists to locate and or to experience. We recommend government and NGO investment in the creation of many new small parks and micro-reserves.

-Tourists must get "educated"; most visitors to the country are not aware of the the real nature of Sri Lanka. We feel there still is a lack of interpretation facilities and information guiding tourists or making them more appreciative of biodiversity (the particulars of biodiversity, not just the, generalized tropical nature image, i.e. the "park scene" and whale-watching safaris...). Many tourists are interested. Many tourists would visit nature attractions. We recommend a series of nature museums, a national aquarium, more publications and web-based material for this. Also private tourism industry stakeholders can better support these developments in their properties and facilities.

- Nature guides (trained professionals who guide in nature) play an important role in wildlife watching outside PAs. The issue of training, certification and enforcement of nature guides is important and has been stressed as a problem in Sri Lankan ecotourism (e.g. Newesome 2013). Universities are supporting nature guide training and many NGOs are on the ground - there is hope for continuing education and training in natural history in Sri Lanka (we've seen great efforts in the Sinharaja area). Any increased government and tourism industry support of this aspect will most definitely increase the quality of wildlife tourism experiences in Sri Lanka. (For example, many of the guides at Sinharaja do not have binoculars - an easy gift that would make them even more effective at their job).

-As in many south Asian destinations, garbage and water pollution is almost everywhere apparent in Sri Lanka (the situation is of course much cleaner than in most of India and the Middle East). Western tourists are known to be particularly sensitive to garbage in nature. A "nature clean-up" campaign would not be costly and this can be organized at many levels of government and by the private sector as well.

Finally, for ecotourism to prosper, sustaining top wildlife watching experiences both inside and outside PAs is very important. We think these have somewhat been neglected when focusing primarily on show-case PAs (National Parks and the safari activities). The parks cannot save the wider landscapes and living landscapes of Sri Lanka and there are certainly serious threats facing biodiversity on this island. This needs to be addressed now, early on, as tourism grows in Sri Lanka. A biodiverse nature-rich tourist experience especially outside PAs needs to be upheld and enhanced.


References

D. Newsome (2013) An ‘ecotourist's recent experience in Sri Lanka, Journal of Ecotourism, 12:3, 210-220, DOI: 10.1080/14724049.2013.879153

Acknowledgements
We thank the following individuals and intuitions for helping us:
-Professor Asanka Jayasinghe and collegues at Ruhuna University
-Sumith Jalath, family and his staff at the Lavendra Villa Mirissa.
-Mike Pope, ornithologist from Kuwait (see:http://www.hawar-islands.com/blog/bugs_stub.php?cat=242)
-Amila Salgado and two excellent local nature guides at Sinharaja Biosphere Reserve
-And we especially thank Gehan de Silva Wijeyeratne for all support both before our trip and during our meeting in Athens in March 2019.



Mirissa, south coast

Polena near Matara

Polena near Matara

Monitor inside Matara city


Cultural landscape immediatly outside Sinharaja Biosphere Reserve


Deniyaya-Mederipitiya



Snake - said to be an Indian Cobra- crossing the road at Mirissa. We saw about four snakes on the trip.

Loten's sunbird, Kandy

Red-wattled lapwing near Kandy

Asian emerald dove near Mirissa
Birding in upland rainforest in Sinharaja Biosphere reserve with top-expert bird guides



The elusive and spectacular island endemic: Sri Lanka blue magpie

Sri Lanka jungle fowl at Deniyaya-Mederipitiya

Upper-mid elevation stream fish in Sinharaja. In this photo, the striped ones are the endemic black-lined barb Systomus pleurotaenia. The rest are young Deccan mahseer Tor khudree. (Thanks to Hiranya Sudasinghe for the fish ID).

Mid elevation rainforest at Deniyaya-Mederipitiya; entering the Sinharaja...


This is an old ranger's center near Deniyaya-Mederipitiya (Sinharaja Biosphere Reserve), the interpretation signs were old, faded and rusted; facilities like this are important and should be maintained.

Yellow-billed babblers near Mirissa

Green imperial-pigeon near Mirissa

Toque macaques at Mirissa

Crested serpent-eagle at Sinharaja (digi-scoped through a powerful Swarowski)

Yellow-browed bulbul, Sinharaja

 Yellow-fronted barbet, uplands cloud forest of Sinharaja

Moorish idol, Parrot Island, Mirissa

Chromis damsels at Polena, Matara
Vassiliki at the Galle fish market.

Vassiliki with the girls at the Batik factory in Kandy.
Us in Kandy.

One of our fine meetings with local specialists; here at Peradeniya: Professors Nimal Gunatilleke and Savitri Gunatilleke - our warmest thanks for the hospitality!
Meetings with the students at Ruhuna University, Matara
Even the most touristy beach on the island had a very special feel, Mirissa.






Tuesday, August 20, 2019

Arras, Albania: Agrotourism guesthouse stay





August 2019
Albania in summer

We spent a few wonderful days this first part of August at a small rural guesthouse in the tiny village of Arras near Peshkopi on the Black Drin River. I'm not going to outline our work here, but I just want to highlight the spot as a great place to visit with family. Northwest Albania is not a well known eco or agro-tourism destination but it has some things to offer that you will not find anywhere in Europe.

Firstly, the traditional Gheg Albanians and their authentic farm culture (complete with donkeys and horses, and true organic permaculture farming). They are the most hospitable people I have met in Europe; in this region they are nearly all Muslim with long-time ties to the land and its waters.

Secondly the authentic cultural landscapes. We often just sat dumb-founded at the beauty and realness, the authenticity. Reminded me of Greece of yesterday ('70s). Seeing working landscapes- living villages, next to mountain wilderness and such rich biodiversity.

And finally, the spell-bounding river and spring waters. Waters everywhere. And the Black Drin river: Most of the day it is clear and cool but after 2 PM the hydropeaking floods from an upstream dam in North Macedonia begin: rising waters a meter or so higher and much swifter. The regulated river pulses with floods and ebbs. And its a big river - kids swim, play and fish; older chaps use dynamite and "batteries" to fish. Huge river quarrying and dumpsites prosper alongside tiny villages that remind one of some far off Asian state. Snorkeling here is wonderful in the morning- clear but with plenty of plastic and other submerged garbage. Our friends also kayaked from the Luzli Bridge to the Arras Bridge (a four hour journey).

Despite the sometimes feelings of "a slight craziness" in this unique country...this is a perfeclty safe and certainly colourful experience. Love Albania!

Visit Arras village with your family and friends, highly recommended.





The Black Drin (Drin i Zi), about an hour's drive downstream of Arras.

The Black Drin about two hour's drive downstream of Arras - actually closer to Kukes. Don't dive from the bridge- we didn't. 

Near Arras on the wonderful dirt road leading from the village to Muhurr Village.


Crossing the cool clear waters: about an hour's drive upstream of Arras.


The river near Arrass village hosts about 18 species of fish; this is one of the rarest, confined to springs and river-side wetlands: the Ohrid Minnow - Pelasgus minutus (species ID awaiting DNA confirmation).

Searching for "trofta" in the Setes canyon: fun but sad too (over-fishing probs here)
While snorkeling you can see several species at small pool channels in the wide braided channels of the river - this is a school of Skadar Gudgeon, Gobio skadarensis
Little jewels in the hand: These tiny minnows Phoxinus sp. are cold-water dwelling species in springs along the main channel. Some populations are in reproductive colours such as this one in the springs near the confluence of the Setes and Drini i Zi rivers (below the village of Arras).
After the dramatic gorge. 


Classic Green Woodpecker Picus viridis, on Robinia pseudacacia (an invasive tree from America). This bird is very common around the Arber Guesthouse. An early morning walk around the guesthouse easily gives 20+ species of birds in early August; one of the commonest being the Golden Oriole! 
Yours was truly shocked to find an immature Golden Eagle electrocuted from a power pole on the road in the lower Canyon. Actually I had seen a huge nest in the canyon and was wondering if it was a Golden Eagle; but no live specimen spotted: a sad find. 
Guesthouse Arber, Arras.

View from the Guesthouse Arber, Arras.

Guesthouse Arber, Arras.

Guesthouse Arber, Arras.

View from the Arber Guesthouse, Arras. Wonderful walking country (no dog probs encountered, but beware of goat-sheep flocks when walking anywhere in the Balkans).

Our host at Guesthouse Arber, Vladimir Marku - with family.


Mr. Vladimir Marku showing the new works at Guesthouse Arber. He really helped us explore the region, helped us feel comfortable on the crazy Albanian roads and made us feel totally at home at his home - even giving each of us Muslim names...(photo by Max W. aka Ali).
Urban getaways not far: In the city of Kukes with Vasso and Donard. 




Tuesday, June 4, 2019

Ichthyology at Oroklini Lake



Spring 2014, 
Oroklini Lake, Cyprus

Fish are supposed to be good indicators. Indicators of what?
At a small coastal marsh in southeastern Cyprus the fishes have guided us towards a different path of understanding  the inner workings of unique limnosystem: its past, present and management for future rehabilitation. Our work at Oroklini Lake is the first to investigate fish and explore aspects of a holistic management.

Fish are important in understanding the integrity of ecosystems - and they help us unravel what a place needs to resotore any semblance of its past natural state.

The Oroklini Lake area or Oroklini Lake Wetland area has four regularly occurring species of fish:
  • Striped Grey Mullet (Mugil cephalus
  • Thin-Lipped Grey Mullet (Liza ramada)
  • Eastern Mosquitofish
  • European Eel 
We have been studying fish at Oroklini in the framework of  a Life Nature project.
But fish are very very scarce in the system!!! I mean you go down, watch for fish and usually see none! (But there are always plenty of birds)....So what does this indicate?

Our understanding so far gives the following research results.

Firstly we discovered that Oroklini Lake is a special heavily modified watland area that has been poorly researched in terms of its hydrobiology.

1) What was "Oroklini lake" before it was artificially "heavily" modified by humans? And this is a critical question because it may lead us to understand how the limnosystem worked, and how native fishes adapted and developed communities and strategies for survival when this was a natural wetland.

Answer: At least one 19th century map does show a lake at the spot - actually being fed by a stream so the "lake" was a natural area and since flow was from a stream - an estuary or river-mouth was present. We are nearly certain the site formed a coastal lagoon system. A seasonally-arid coastal lagoon system that may have gained waters either from the small stream and/or from south-wind marine water surges.

2) Is Oroklini a lake or a coastal lagoon?

Answer: Coastal Lagoon but with a grain of salt (!!!). Most visitors who see the "Lake" today would argue against this since the system is atypical...and in a very peculiar "degraded" situation today. In fact the "lake-like basin" is separated by a wide sandy coastal bar that is about 400 m wide and the connections to the sea are only two artificial drainage canals (the "West Canal" is actually no longer directly connected to the lake basin...). However I am calling it a heavily modified coastal lagoon for the following reasons: a) The historic map I have shows a natural lacustrine body by the shore with an inflowing stream, and the low depression near the shoreline creates conditions for flooding and water flow toward the sea. Coastal process - head-on south winds would build a sandbar. Also, the salina-like pan is salty - brackish usually today. I am sure it was originally a coastal lagoon habitat.

3) What would you expect to be the 'reference conditions' of the wetland?

Answer: Weird and varied coastal lagoon stuff (...). The system was MUCH bigger 100 years ago. So there was a connection with the sea (perhaps more run-off, perhaps marine wave flooding...). However it is a very small catchment and drought does effect and extirpate fishes. So I expect only Mugilids, Eel, Mediterranean Killifish  - that's all. To construct references (i.e. refrence conditions to guid restoration) we need to look deeply into the ecological history of the site (and that's another project altogether).

4) What would you do now?

Answer: Just like you can restore and enhance habitat for birds, you can do the same for fish, and here some suggestions:

a) Protect the inflow and ensure outflows to the sea (one outflow, the East Canal exists - see report).
b) Ensure unobstructed passage of eels and mugilids from the sea. Provide "turf" for the elvers to scale the Spillway Sluice at the "Lake"-proper and provide passage from both Canals.
c) Ensure refugia for eels and mugilids during normal years.
d) Conditions are not optimal for introducing Killifish (Aphanius fasciatus) but perhaps an experimental attempt can be carried out. The big problem here is that most waters dry out on very dry years and in "normal years" there is an abundance of mosquitofish (a direct competitor and aggressive alien invasive). The question of re-introducing Mediterranean Killifish is important - it needs some bold experimenting.

Have a look at my report:

Ichthyological_Study_for_Oroklini_Lake_Cyprus

Please see acknowledgments in the report for all the people who banded together and helped us in this. And in 2018, the local Water Development Department also attempted their first eel pass- could work!



Yours truly, looking for fish in the salty mud. Good help from Athina Papatheodoulou and friends. 

Phragmites reeds.

Upper part of the "Lake" above the weir - floods in winter and is full of birds.

Restoration actions by BirdLife Cyprus.

Birds are good indicators too!


Thursday, May 23, 2019

A Landscape Assessment Protocol







"Reading the landscape": LAP - a new assessment protocol 
Published in "Sustainability" April 2019

In a recent paper, we introduce an on-site field survey method to assess the conservation condition of landscapes, the LAP.

ASSESSING LANDSCAPES...a daunting task...

Using a popular rapid assessment format - scoring metrics from viewpoints - this study defines observable “stressed states” in each metric in order to gauge overall landscape degradation. Fifteen metrics within six thematic categories were selected through a literature review and extensive field trials.

The protocol effectively goes beyond a traditional visual aesthetic assessment; it can be used both by experts and non-scientists as a conservation-relevant procedure to support a holistic landscape diagnosis. The combination of an on-site experiential survey and its simple integrative format may be useful as a screening-level index, and for promoting local participation, landscape literacy and educational initiatives.


Please read at: Sustainability 11, 2019

The protocol sheet and criteria: 

Landscape_Assessment_Protocol-LAP


In the near-future we will present a how-to-guide on this protocol, for now any correspondence on the issue should go to Panayotis Dimopoulos (pdimopoulos@upatras) and Vassiliki Vlami (vas.vlami@gmail.com).




The LAP field form’s scoring card with the 15 metrics used to assess landscape conservation status (these are scored by the assessor using a 10-1 (Excellent-Bad) scale and guided by a detailed guidance narrative. 

Results of index calculation of 35 landscape sites on Samothraki, as assessed by a single expert.

Field tests on Samothraki show a positive correlation between a single expert’s scores and five assessor’s scores at 35 landscape sites.


Kozbeyli wind farm and the noticeable changes to landscape and ecosystems due to this ridge-line location site; typical of many wind turbine developments in Turkey and other areas (from paper on scoring wind park impacts, see: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115014008). Photo curtesy of Serhat Kucukali.

This is a descriptive poster from an initiative that describes restoration actions and gives the impression that we are dealing with the landscape scale. It focuses on functions such as water cycles etc. (see: https://www.behance.net/gallery/73243657/Ecosystem-Restoration-Camps)
And finally, the much tweeted graphic showing that wildlife is a good indicator of landscape degradation (origins unknown, but definately a true graphic). Same could be said about flora and natural vegetation metrics.